It’s 3AM, sinuses are driving me crazy, so why not write something. Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about men and women. There are 2 ways to look at the differences between men and women, glass half-empty or glass half-full. I tend towards glass half-empty. This may be the result of large amounts of failure with women in my life, at some point it becomes hard to remain optimistic of success. Determination is all well and good but at some point you have to be realistic – will I ever really figure out what it takes to be happy with a woman in my life? I certainly want it, or a part of me wants it, but another part of me doesn’t want it, because women are so difficult to understand and relate to. It’s like a really complicated math problem that you have some awareness of how to solve but just can’t and you suspect you just simply don’t have the intellectual, or perhaps emotional, prowess. You know enough to know that you don’t have what it takes to really know. You know there are things that you don’t know. It reminds me of something Dick Rumsfeld said a few years ago.
There is nothing wrong with accepting our limitations, as much as I would like to think about a career professionally racing motorcycles I know my opportunity to do such is long past. I can dream but I know it will never happen. It never even had a possibility of being my life. I’m 41 and have been a failure to date with women and most of the time I feel this will always be the case. At some point it would be good to stop pining to have lived another life and accept fate. I look at my father, at 81 he is still lusting after women and has even grander catastrophes than myself with the opposite sex. Is he a fool or an eternal optimistic? I think he is a fool and quite possibly even pathetic. I don’t want to be 81 and considered a fool, not to mention pathetic. This is not a plea for pity.
I’ve got a few minutes until the allergy drugs kick in, why not try and figure it all out! I’ll start with Men, being a man should mean I understand them better compared to women. I think that’s true. The other advantage with talking about men is that The Problem With Men is very simple: SEX. Yeah I know, what a genius! Did it really take me 41 years to figure this out? Well, yes! We have sex on our minds constantly, you could say 24 hours a day. I just woke up in a sinus congested induced stupor (you might wonder how I can write so coherently being in such a state – well then again you be the judge!) from a dream I was having about sex. It might have ended happily (Happy Ending! Happy Ending!) if I hadn’t woken up, because I sure had a nice woody going. Then again I did have to pee and that provided some release. It’s not the same, trust me. I was climbing Mt. Everest (no doubt inspired by a recent PBS documentary I was watching on a massively failed expedition) and who should I meet but a girl I had a crush on many years ago when in High School (I would include her name but that might be a little creepy). I got re-acquainted with her recently through re-connecting with another classmate of mine that has recently married her sister. (As a side-note I did ask about M* and it turns out she also married a couple of years ago and recently had her first baby) She meets two other climbers, hugs them and then starts “air-licking” them provocatively (she was doing a Gene Simmons act-alike while in close proximity to their necks and faces), which of course causes me to have an erection (although there is the possibility I had the erection first and then the dream followed – it reminds me of times when I was kid and had dreams of peeing against a tree in the woods only to wake and find I was peeing the bed) that really rages when she finishes with them and then starts REALLY licking me. In the dream I can smell her sweat, her heat, her body and it really turns me on. I can taste her in my dream. I wake up with a raging boner. Can you blame me? M* still looks really hot, judging by the myspace pictures. Big inviting smile, sultry eyes, kissable lips…
Even while sleeping I can’t help but thinking about sex! I dream about it! I know, it’s messed up. I’m sure women have sexual dreams too but that is a topic for another time. Further, would you like to know the common test for erectile dysfunction? You buy a roll, more or less depending on the size of your member, of old lick-em-and-stick-em stamps and you paste them on your wiener before going to bed, if the stamps are separated when you wake up then you DON’T have erectile dysfunction. If they are still attached then you DO have erectile dysfunction, because every night, whether you realize it or not, men normally have one or more erections. It’s like the body is practicing for the Big Event, even while you sleep! How else do you explain it?
Our sexual drive isn’t all bad – after all this helps ensure survival of our species. Without our drive we may not be that inclined to have sex which would quickly end the human race as we know it. Sex is fun too – it strikes some primitive hormonal and emotional cord with us. It feels good to be with a woman (or a man as the case might be), the dirtier the better. Spank me Baby! We don’t need science to tell us these things. Women have sexual drive too but their evolutionary heritage connects it differently in their minds. I’ll share my thoughts on this topic another time!
The problem of course is evolution. By all accounts men didn’t spend a lot of time with their women, nor with their children, at least not early on, and definitely not with the girls. The men were off gathering food, hunting usually, and this necessitated extended leave from the clan, leaving the old men and women in charge. The women spent much more time together sharpening their relationship skills, sometimes put to good use, other times put to poor use, to manipulate and control. Naturally the women competed for the attention and sex of the dominant men and it’s highly likely that the dominant men had several sexual partners. This is demonstrated by other species in the natural world, most behave in this manner. The males fight to secure their leadership and this leadership comes with a few perks, one of which being the rights to several women, or several wives at least. This also explains why men are by and large so incapable of understanding women, we just didn’t spend enough time to figure them out. It’s not in our genes.
Fast forward a few hundred thousand years and while society has changed dramatically the basic urges are still largely intact. Men still jostle for position and women still jostle to be favored by a man, or by men. Any doubters of this only spend an hour or two in their nearby mall, which is overwhelmingly an extravaganza of shopping opportunities for women. Why do women need all these blouses, skirts, pants, perfumes, make-up, and lingerie? When have you ever seen a lingerie shop for men? The fact is men are competing with each other and wearing lingerie won’t help in this battle, unless of course you want to lose. You can argue this point with me and assert we’ve left our evolutionary heritage behind but it becomes really tough to explain these facts. These urges are necessary, otherwise we wouldn’t copulate and without which we would all die off.
You want further proof regarding how men are approaching women? Consider the criteria by which men judge the appearance of a woman. Generally the breasts are first, the ass is second, more general body proportions third and last their face. You could re-arrange these depending on the man, some are “ass men”, others are “breast men”, but the idea is the same. What are we subconsciously doing? We are judging their physical characteristics by their suitability for producing children. (Who cares about personality? We aren’t wired to be spending a lot of time with them anyway, so what difference does their personality make?) How else can you explain it? Think about the breasts, what difference does it really make whether they are large (universally favored) or small, perky (universally favored) or saggy? The difference is that a large perky breast is on some crude level understood to be better suited to nursing our children, and likewise to product healthy children. The bigger the breast the more milk it surely must produce! The more milk it produces surely must produce bigger children! The same goes for the ass. How exactly is a baby supposed to fit between the huge butt cheeks of a fat-assed woman? Occasionally you hear of reports in the news of fat women who have smothered their children to death while sleeping with them. How is a fat woman supposed to be healthy enough not only to produce my child but also survive and be healthy enough to raise it? Oh I’m sure some men would argue this suggestion (and women too!) but the fact is we are wired to think about survival and the manner in which we evaluate women reflects this. Darwin was right, all animals - humans are no exception - are operating on survival instincts, and no more is this true in our evaluation of a womans appearance.
What does this mean about us men? We are thinking about sex 24 hours a day because our sex drive is connected with our need to control and dominate situations around us. By extension this includes our women because our women, as producers of our offspring, are our future. We want to control our future. When considering this context the actions of men in a broader sense all makes a lot of sense. Most men though live in societies that only permit a single woman, whether called “girlfriend”, “significant other”, or “wife”. Men haven’t accepted this though, even when ensconced in a “committed relationship” (whatever that means) we still can’t but think about other women, and usually in sexual ways. We want other women but have learned to control ourselves, for the most part anyway. When they walk by us at the mall, even if holding the hand of the woman we’ve professed our love for, we can’t help but admire and conjure up depraved thoughts involving positions we’ve yet to try with our love interest in hand. I don’t have a rational response to this reality of men, except to say that I know it’s the truth. The truth is not pretty in many cases, and this is one of those cases.
So men are faced with several challenges, not the least of which is that we can’t have all the sexual partners that we desire. We MUST control ourselves, otherwise we end up with NONE. The wise man Jesus apparently said something to this effect “The man that commits adultery in his heart commits adultery with his member” so by this measure I’ve failed. By a more realistic measure, meaning given opportunities to satisfy my longings and having turned them down out of respect for my partner at the time, I’ve succeeded. I have never partaken of a woman while in a “committed relationship” with another woman. Many men, perhaps most, would fail this. This isn’t to say I’m better than these men, on the contrary if I was truly good I would not even have contemplated the actions. Oh I contemplated, and in some cases agonized! I am not that good. There are some that are that good. This leads to the second challenge – to separate our sexual drive from our more rational drive when it comes to choosing a woman and then remaining with her. Sex drive is like a cloud that hangs over our thinking, a fog not unlike that induced by alcohol. We know our rational thinking is there but we are slightly, or grossly, as the case might be, out of touch with it. Men are born with “Sex Goggles”.
It then becomes very difficult to think about our potential partners in a rational, realistic way. Love is also a type of fog, but I argue that for men it’s mostly a fog of sex. In another entry I’ll argue that women are primarily subject to the fog of love. As men we want “it”, therefore we will sacrifice good sense if need be, to have “it”. It doesn’t matter if we see no future with the person we are with, we aren’t even thinking that way. Future? Ejaculation is 30 seconds away! What the hell else could possibly matter right now? If we attempted a rational thought process with most of the women we meet we would quickly realize there isn’t a future with that person, and so we move on. We don’t move on though, at least not until we’ve satisfied our lust, or the woman tells us to go to hell. Once we’ve gotten “it”, it becomes easy to move on, we got what we came (no pun intended) for, we can take the phone number and never call back, we can leave before they wake up and not even leave a note, we can operate without a last name, hell even a first name is optional with the right pair of goggles.
What is a man to do about then? It is a dilemma for sure. I don’t think I have all the answers, at least not for men at large. I do believe every man should attempt reduction of themselves to understand what exactly it is that they want. This in itself is a challenge because this implies connectivity with our emotional inner selves – and I don’t need to tell you that this is a challenge for most men. However, over the years I’ve learned some techniques to fool myself, and they are remarkably simple. I try to picture myself with this person in 6 months, 1 year, 5 years time. Will I still be with them? Where do I want to see my life in that time and given what I’ve learned about this person would they be part of that picture? There is an implied challenge there too, I have to know enough about the person to understand something about who they are and whether they fit into the picture of who I am and where I’m going.
Another aspect of this technique – wait as long as possible to have sex with them! Once “first contact” is made it becomes very difficult to think clearly about the person because if I like them enough to see them again, am I thinking only about having sex with them or about having a life with them? There is a big difference between those two concepts. It’s also important to not get confused by the quality of the sex. I’ve had amazing sex with some women that clearly I had no future with and if I had thought for a nanosecond while with them about the future I would have ended it sooner rather than later. Even better I wouldn’t have started. There’s the self-control problem again. Women do seem to have more of a tendency to be fooled by the quality of the sex. Really good sex is not that hard to learn – it is amazing to me how many men are really bad at it though. This no doubt is behind some of the notions that women have, you find a man who really satisfies you then there must be something special there! We got “chemistry” baby! I’m not going to let this one go! I’ve been with enough women now to become fairly proficient at it, meaning a good time was had by all. This will definitely be a topic for another entry. So by putting off sex as long as possible it seems to help the thinking process, or at least keep it more rational and more likely to succeed. In the end success largely derives from a rational process and relationships are no different. This may be the Engineer in me talking. Although to date I haven’t been successful, but I’m not dead yet! Hopefully along the way I’m learning about myself, men, women and what it takes to have a successful relationship. I wish you the same good fortune!